<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: King Kong (2005)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://fromthebalcony.com/movie-reviews/king-kong-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://fromthebalcony.com/movie-reviews/king-kong-2005/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=king-kong-2005</link>
	<description>Remade, rebooted, or reimagined every 5 years.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Susu		</title>
		<link>https://fromthebalcony.com/movie-reviews/king-kong-2005/#comment-1936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Susu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 18:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/ftb/?p=419#comment-1936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t get me wrong, I still love Jurassic Park, but the technology there is now twelve years old. Peter Jackson&#039;s KING KONG is the experience for which movies were invented. The CGI was incredible, the casting appropriate (this wasn&#039;t supposed to be an actor-driven, big-star film, after all), and the flow was satisfying. Even the somewhat slow build-up had a huge payoff once you see Kong running through the jungle with Ann in his giant hand. Is it a flawless movie? Probably not. But it Is a perfect example of why we go to movies in the first place-- to see things that we will never see in our real lives. When I walked out of the theater and was making my way through the deserted lobby, I had an odd feeling. Every poster I saw for an upcoming film kind of made me feel like all those movies were probably just going to be a waste of film next to KING KONG.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I still love Jurassic Park, but the technology there is now twelve years old. Peter Jackson&#8217;s KING KONG is the experience for which movies were invented. The CGI was incredible, the casting appropriate (this wasn&#8217;t supposed to be an actor-driven, big-star film, after all), and the flow was satisfying. Even the somewhat slow build-up had a huge payoff once you see Kong running through the jungle with Ann in his giant hand. Is it a flawless movie? Probably not. But it Is a perfect example of why we go to movies in the first place&#8211; to see things that we will never see in our real lives. When I walked out of the theater and was making my way through the deserted lobby, I had an odd feeling. Every poster I saw for an upcoming film kind of made me feel like all those movies were probably just going to be a waste of film next to KING KONG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
