Oh god, my grammar.

It started out as a good mystery, but halfway through the plot it took a turn in a twisted and psycho-sort-of-way, that made it too unbelievable for me to take serious and genuinely enjoy.

I understand that film-makers constantly try to think-up of new and differnt narratives to keep movie-goers returning to the movies, but when things get unrealistically extreme, it loses it’s potentiality and probability to even identify with the story or characters in a substantive way. (similarly I didn’t feel that much different about Nightcrawler).

I found the evolution of Amy’s character into this monster very thin, mostly lacking, and I was not persuaded. The husband’s character is more plausible and persuasive, but still it did not make sense for him to stay in an unhappy marriage and start up an affair, instead of separating.

If the message of the film is to showcase the stupidity and abhorrent nature in broadcast reporting, and not to judge too quickly, before hearing both sides of a story, I didn’t really care too much for that message, because I already know this, and I don’t watch a lot of TV because I think it’s mostly garbage anyway. I already know networks always seem to over-sensationalize and exaggerate things, and sometimes down-right lie and even totally make up things, so I don’t really buy into that kind of bull anyway. I think any normal, sane, logical person understands this already.